Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
71.8162
Damage (total/round)
39773
Player score (round)
37851010
Damage (total/round)
38773
Player score (round)
35291010
Player score (round)
36871010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
30%
Ancient
15%
Inferno
14%
Nuke
13%
Anubis
8%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
34
1
Dust II
0%
2
23
Ancient
49%
55
7
Inferno
43%
30
6
Nuke
46%
41
0
Anubis
38%
37
6
Mirage
35%
37
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
17
Dust II
30%
10
7
Ancient
34%
38
0
Inferno
57%
7
4
Nuke
59%
29
0
Anubis
30%
20
7
Mirage
39%
23
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Preasy vs Heimo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Preasy and Heimo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Preasy. The MVP of this match was AcilioN.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Preasy were AcilioN contributed 42 kills and Beccie contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21282 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Heimo were Spargo contributed 40 kills and arvid contributed 35 kills. 19356 of total damage by Heimo could not prevent Preasy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Heimo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments