0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:30s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.416.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.73.8
Player score (round)
36061012
Damage (total/round)
39473
Shots (total/round)
8416
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
22%
Overpass
15%
Ancient
12%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
7%
Nuke
4%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
75%
4
8
Overpass
60%
10
2
Ancient
70%
20
1
Inferno
46%
13
1
Mirage
40%
5
19
Nuke
57%
7
6
Anubis
0%
2
18
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
53%
15
20
Overpass
45%
11
14
Ancient
58%
33
0
Inferno
57%
14
8
Mirage
33%
9
18
Nuke
53%
19
0
Anubis
0%
1
33
Info
Match analysis of Preasy vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Preasy and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Preasy. The MVP of this match was uli.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Preasy were TMB contributed 19 kills and refrezh contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10183 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were uli contributed 23 kills and ottoNd contributed 24 kills. 10010 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent Preasy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments