0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:27s
Kills on a map
40.9417.3379
Deaths on a map
017
Damage (avg/round)
171.71915.9
Headshots on a map
230.3126
Deaths on a map
017
Player score (round)
34971011
Shots (total/round)
8716
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Anubis
78%
Nuke
70%
Vertigo
42%
Ancient
38%
Overpass
10%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
7
3
Anubis
78%
9
2
Nuke
30%
10
11
Vertigo
33%
3
14
Ancient
67%
15
3
Overpass
40%
5
14
Inferno
0%
1
28
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
8
Anubis
0%
2
3
Nuke
100%
3
3
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Ancient
29%
7
1
Overpass
50%
4
3
Inferno
0%
1
4
Info
Match analysis of PERA vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by PERA. The MVP of this match was Kamion.
PERA analytics
The team PERA secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PERA were Kamion contributed 16 kills and msN contributed 3 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 1863 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PERA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Viperio were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Viperio could not prevent PERA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Viperio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments