0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
133
AK47 kills on a map
166.7456
AK47 damage (avg/round)
93.625.4
AK47 kills on a map
96.7456
Openning kills on a map
62.9143
Headshots on a map
13.050.3103
Player score (round)
50011012
Damage (total/round)
38273
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
80%
Ancient
65%
Vertigo
63%
Inferno
60%
Mirage
57%
Nuke
24%
Overpass
21%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
2
0
Ancient
100%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Inferno
0%
0
4
Mirage
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
3
Overpass
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
20%
5
19
Ancient
35%
17
5
Vertigo
63%
16
3
Inferno
60%
10
7
Mirage
43%
14
10
Nuke
24%
17
1
Overpass
29%
7
9
Info
Match analysis of PERA vs Sashi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and Sashi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by PERA. The MVP of this match was Aaron.
PERA analytics
The team PERA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PERA were Aaron contributed 19 kills and Porya contributed 11 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6283 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PERA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sashi were nut nut contributed 12 kills and aizy contributed 7 kills. 5091 of total damage by Sashi could not prevent PERA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sashi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments