0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:27s
HE damage (avg/round)
13.13.4
Percentage of headshots
45%15%
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.63.9
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.52
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.8354
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
71%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
46%
Mirage
25%
Overpass
6%
Nuke
2%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
7
2
Vertigo
50%
2
12
Inferno
0%
1
21
Mirage
100%
6
1
Overpass
40%
5
10
Nuke
33%
6
10
Ancient
62%
13
2
Last 5 maps
Anubis
29%
17
12
Vertigo
0%
5
27
Inferno
46%
13
15
Mirage
75%
8
9
Overpass
46%
13
12
Nuke
31%
13
24
Ancient
63%
30
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of PERA vs IKLA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and IKLA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by PERA. The MVP of this match was DGL.
PERA analytics
The team PERA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PERA were DGL contributed 19 kills and Kamion contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7284 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PERA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
IKLA analytics
The team IKLA managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for IKLA were adeX contributed 16 kills and Topa contributed 10 kills. 5879 of total damage by IKLA could not prevent PERA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, IKLA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments