0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.32.1
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
134.1
Trades on a map
11.043.428
Player score (round)
36631010
Player score (round)
35311010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
64%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
29%
Vertigo
27%
Nuke
13%
Mirage
12%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
27
Dust II
50%
4
0
Ancient
44%
16
3
Vertigo
36%
11
7
Nuke
50%
14
3
Mirage
62%
13
3
Anubis
56%
16
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
64%
11
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Ancient
73%
11
7
Vertigo
63%
8
4
Nuke
63%
8
2
Mirage
50%
12
3
Anubis
55%
20
4
Info
Match analysis of PERA vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was DSSj.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED secured 29 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCRED were DSSj contributed 43 kills and 1NVISIBLE contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21404 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PERA analytics
The team PERA managed to secure 24 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PERA were Aaron contributed 45 kills and Porya contributed 36 kills. 19670 of total damage by PERA could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments