0 Comments
95
85
24
+10
400
14:12
27
2
Ancient6.3
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Mirage
61%
Inferno
55%
Overpass
50%
Vertigo
P
25%
Ancient
20%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
2
Mirage
25%
4
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
50%
2
0
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Ancient
20%
5
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
4
3
Mirage
86%
7
0
Inferno
55%
11
2
Overpass
100%
1
0
Vertigo
75%
4
2
Ancient
40%
5
4
Nuke
0%
1
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of Pepsilon vs Strive in chaos by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Pepsilon and Strive in chaos, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Strive in chaos. The MVP of this match was Akamy.
Strive in chaos analytics
The team Strive in chaos secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Strive in chaos were Maki contributed 24 kills and CHANKY contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10391 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Strive in chaos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Pepsilon analytics
The team Pepsilon managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Pepsilon were Akamy contributed 27 kills and Ludwig contributed 17 kills. 9733 of total damage by Pepsilon could not prevent Strive in chaos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Pepsilon struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments