0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.7
5.3
Vertigo1.5
Win Rounds
16
8
Vertigo8
Kills
94
68
Vertigo26
Damage
10.05K
8.06K
Vertigo1989
Economy
516.6K
441.7K
Vertigo74900
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
P
60%
Ancient
40%
Overpass
38%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
P
25%
Nuke
11%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
1
Overpass
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Mirage
25%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Dust II
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
40%
5
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Overpass
38%
8
0
Inferno
33%
6
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
11%
9
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of Pepsilon vs EPIC DUDES by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Pepsilon and EPIC DUDES, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Pepsilon. The MVP of this match was Ralle.
Pepsilon analytics
The team Pepsilon secured 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Pepsilon were Ralle contributed 25 kills and Ariant0 contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10049 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Pepsilon held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EPIC DUDES analytics
The team EPIC DUDES managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EPIC DUDES were giM contributed 19 kills and Ponke contributed 13 kills. 8060 of total damage by EPIC DUDES could not prevent Pepsilon from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EPIC DUDES struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments