0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:16s01:55s
Player score (round)
35191010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
56%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
29%
Anubis
24%
Vertigo
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
56%
9
0
Inferno
50%
8
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
29%
7
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
1
Inferno
100%
1
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
67%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Ancient
0%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of PCIFIC vs Souls Heart by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PCIFIC and Souls Heart, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Souls Heart. The MVP of this match was Altekz.
Souls Heart analytics
The team Souls Heart secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Souls Heart were Altekz contributed 24 kills and Rezst contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9696 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Souls Heart held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PCIFIC analytics
The team PCIFIC managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PCIFIC were Weirdaimm contributed 17 kills and eNs contributed 16 kills. 8424 of total damage by PCIFIC could not prevent Souls Heart from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PCIFIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments