0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5
6.2
Nuke-2
Win Rounds
19
24
Nuke1
Kills
125
159
Nuke0
Damage
14.7K
17.22K
Nuke-84
Economy
778.15K
964.15K
Nuke650
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
15.43.4
USP damage (avg/round)
15.74.9
USP kills on a map
31.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
14.44.9
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6028
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4531
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.74.2
AK47 kills on a map
156.3792
AK47 damage (avg/round)
66.725.2
Tec-9 kills on a map
41.3022
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of PCIFIC vs benched by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PCIFIC and benched, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by benched. The MVP of this match was supra.
benched analytics
The team benched secured 24 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for benched were supra contributed 33 kills and Pipw contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17223 overall damage.
On the defensive side, benched held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PCIFIC analytics
The team PCIFIC managed to secure 19 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PCIFIC were EMSTAR contributed 37 kills and lugseN contributed 23 kills. 14701 of total damage by PCIFIC could not prevent benched from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PCIFIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments