0 Comments
69
85
26
-16
367
8:13
14
3
-3%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:23s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.84.2
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:26s00:35s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7128
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4531
Galil kills on a map
41.8162
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.36
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4531
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
18.34.2
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.26
Info
Map Analysis of Patins da Ferrari vs ShindeN by the Bo3.gg Team
ShindeN on Dust II Analysis
ShindeN demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ShindeN on Dust II were ivz, who contributed 18 kills, and roy, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8693 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, ShindeN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Patins da Ferrari on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Patins da Ferrari, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Patins da Ferrari on Dust II included proSHOW, who contributed 25 kills, and perez, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7698 total damage, Patins da Ferrari couldn't prevent ShindeN from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Patins da Ferrari struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments