0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
73%
Anubis
67%
Ancient
62%
Mirage
52%
Nuke
T
50%
Dust II
7%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
73%
41
8
Anubis
67%
60
6
Ancient
62%
61
14
Mirage
52%
62
7
Nuke
0%
0
71
Dust II
47%
30
23
Inferno
53%
34
16
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Dust II
40%
5
0
Inferno
50%
4
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wwllw
Info
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs The Spells by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Inferno Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Inferno were jackasmo, who contributed 21 kills, and fear, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8160 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
The Spells on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for The Spells, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for The Spells on Inferno included discoStar, who contributed 12 kills, and azizz, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6610 total damage, The Spells couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, The Spells struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments