0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
60%
Inferno
51%
Vertigo
47%
Anubis
20%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
5%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
80
Inferno
51%
35
16
Vertigo
69%
48
11
Anubis
63%
63
10
Ancient
60%
67
13
Mirage
55%
66
8
Dust II
50%
28
22
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
40
2
Inferno
0%
0
39
Vertigo
22%
18
14
Anubis
43%
37
8
Ancient
54%
37
3
Mirage
50%
26
9
Dust II
53%
15
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of Passion UA vs RUBY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Passion UA and RUBY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by RUBY. The MVP of this match was mo0n.
RUBY analytics
The team RUBY secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for RUBY were mo0n contributed 22 kills and forkyz contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8740 overall damage.
On the defensive side, RUBY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Passion UA analytics
The team Passion UA managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Passion UA were fear contributed 16 kills and jackasmo contributed 16 kills. 7083 of total damage by Passion UA could not prevent RUBY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Passion UA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments