0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
37341011
Player score (round)
34871011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Nuke
46%
Inferno
36%
Mirage
33%
Vertigo
3%
Ancient
1%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
2
Nuke
0%
0
36
Inferno
44%
18
11
Mirage
53%
32
8
Vertigo
53%
30
3
Ancient
56%
50
0
Anubis
59%
34
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Nuke
46%
24
6
Inferno
80%
25
6
Mirage
20%
5
47
Vertigo
56%
34
6
Ancient
55%
42
5
Anubis
59%
32
24
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of Passion UA vs Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Passion UA and Preasy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Passion UA. The MVP of this match was Jambo.
Passion UA analytics
The team Passion UA secured 29 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Passion UA were Jambo contributed 47 kills and fear contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16029 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy managed to secure 15 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Preasy were Griller contributed 36 kills and Beccie contributed 26 kills. 13920 of total damage by Preasy could not prevent Passion UA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments