0 Comments
Teams advantage Mirage (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
70%
Vertigo
51%
Dust II
33%
Anubis
30%
Mirage
28%
Inferno
4%
Ancient
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
41
Vertigo
51%
37
3
Dust II
33%
3
5
Anubis
63%
38
7
Mirage
57%
40
8
Inferno
48%
21
11
Ancient
54%
57
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
70%
10
4
Vertigo
0%
0
18
Dust II
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
12
4
Mirage
29%
14
4
Inferno
44%
9
1
Ancient
50%
14
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs JANO by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Mirage Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Mirage were Jambo, who contributed 19 kills, and fear, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8789 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
JANO on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for JANO, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for JANO on Mirage included Sm1llee, who contributed 22 kills, and Cliqq, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7326 total damage, JANO couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, JANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments