Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6027
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Player score (round)
34721010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
62%
Vertigo
61%
Inferno
46%
Dust II
42%
Anubis
36%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
62%
74
4
Vertigo
61%
44
8
Inferno
46%
35
15
Dust II
42%
19
13
Anubis
61%
57
8
Mirage
58%
60
10
Nuke
0%
0
63
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Anubis
25%
4
0
Mirage
50%
6
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of Passion UA vs Banger Gang by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Passion UA and Banger Gang, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Passion UA. The MVP of this match was ZeRRoFIX.
Passion UA analytics
The team Passion UA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Passion UA were ZeRRoFIX contributed 21 kills and Jambo contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7956 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Banger Gang analytics
The team Banger Gang managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Banger Gang were hatex contributed 14 kills and -Rip contributed 9 kills. 5345 of total damage by Banger Gang could not prevent Passion UA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Banger Gang struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments