0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
53%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
41%
Overpass
37%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
10%
Dust II
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
4
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
33%
6
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Dust II
43%
7
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
53%
19
8
Nuke
0%
3
16
Ancient
41%
22
2
Overpass
70%
23
1
Inferno
58%
31
1
Mirage
50%
12
6
Dust II
44%
9
12
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Party Daddlers vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Party Daddlers and ALTERNATE aTTaX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by ALTERNATE aTTaX. The MVP of this match was Pdy.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were Pdy contributed 21 kills and PANIX contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8834 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Party Daddlers analytics
The team Party Daddlers managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Party Daddlers were syncD contributed 14 kills and DeniMM contributed 8 kills. 5025 of total damage by Party Daddlers could not prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Party Daddlers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments