0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
23%
Ancient
18%
Overpass
8%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
5%
Mirage
1%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
6
21
Ancient
40%
5
23
Overpass
55%
22
6
Inferno
72%
39
6
Nuke
64%
36
1
Mirage
57%
23
19
Vertigo
0%
0
54
Last 5 maps
Dust II
73%
11
11
Ancient
58%
12
6
Overpass
63%
16
2
Inferno
65%
17
10
Nuke
59%
22
5
Mirage
56%
9
12
Vertigo
0%
0
34
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of Party Astronauts vs Isurus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Party Astronauts and Isurus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was Gafolo.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were Gafolo contributed 23 kills and Noktse contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9844 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Party Astronauts analytics
The team Party Astronauts managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Party Astronauts were Jonji contributed 18 kills and PwnAlone contributed 14 kills. 8072 of total damage by Party Astronauts could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Party Astronauts struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments