0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Records Ancient
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:24s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
48.316.3
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
Galil kills on a map
41.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.46
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.62
M4A4 kills on a map
83.3832
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.64.2
Info
Map Analysis of Party Astronauts vs E-Xolos LAZER by the Bo3.gg Team
Party Astronauts on Ancient Analysis
Party Astronauts demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Party Astronauts on Ancient were Peeping, who contributed 25 kills, and ben1337, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8247 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Party Astronauts held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for E-Xolos LAZER, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient included danoco, who contributed 15 kills, and tatazin, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7164 total damage, E-Xolos LAZER couldn't prevent Party Astronauts from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, E-Xolos LAZER struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments