0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
146.4203
M4A1 kills on a map
94.3478
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
38673
Player score (round)
35421010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
71%
Nuke
63%
Inferno
37%
Vertigo
29%
Anubis
16%
Dust II
13%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
71%
7
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Inferno
100%
6
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
50%
4
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
50%
10
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
12
Nuke
63%
27
2
Inferno
63%
19
1
Vertigo
29%
7
6
Anubis
66%
32
1
Dust II
46%
24
1
Ancient
45%
31
3
Info
Match analysis of PARTIZAN vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PARTIZAN and GenOne, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by GenOne. The MVP of this match was JACKZ.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GenOne were JACKZ contributed 22 kills and Kursy contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7327 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PARTIZAN analytics
The team PARTIZAN managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PARTIZAN were yakuza contributed 21 kills and verbal4buser contributed 11 kills. 6486 of total damage by PARTIZAN could not prevent GenOne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PARTIZAN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments