Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
238
Headshots (total/map)
258
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Player score (round)
46251010
Player score (round)
40121010
Player score (round)
35211010
Player score (round)
46141010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Dust II
57%
Inferno
33%
Ancient
32%
Vertigo
17%
Anubis
14%
Nuke
7%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
9
Dust II
57%
14
1
Inferno
67%
9
1
Ancient
35%
20
3
Vertigo
17%
6
4
Anubis
64%
25
1
Nuke
57%
21
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
1
Dust II
0%
3
0
Inferno
100%
5
0
Ancient
67%
3
1
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Anubis
50%
2
1
Nuke
50%
4
1
Info
Match analysis of GenOne vs Partizan by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GenOne and Partizan, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by GenOne. The MVP of this match was drac.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne secured 46 out of 86 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 12 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GenOne were drac contributed 66 kills and Brooxsy contributed 67 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31213 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Partizan analytics
The team Partizan managed to secure 0 out of 86 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Partizan were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Partizan could not prevent GenOne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Partizan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments