0 Comments
140
102
55
+38
393
21:17
35
2
Anubis7.5
+9%
96
143
35
-47
293
17:21
19
1
Anubis4.3
-19%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
96.3792
AK47 damage (avg/round)
66.725.2
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4531
USP kills on a map
31.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
13.74.9
AK47 kills on a map
126.3792
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.725.2
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.94.2
USP damage (avg/round)
13.94.9
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.816.3
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
61%
Dust II
36%
Inferno
26%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
10%
Mirage
5%
Train
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
61%
31
7
Dust II
71%
28
1
Inferno
78%
9
18
Nuke
50%
4
36
Anubis
60%
15
9
Mirage
41%
22
7
Train
63%
8
8
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
54
Dust II
35%
17
13
Inferno
52%
23
6
Nuke
64%
36
4
Anubis
50%
36
4
Mirage
36%
28
20
Train
60%
10
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwww
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of PARIVISION vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PARIVISION and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Dust II, and victory was secured by PARIVISION. The MVP of this match was Jame.
PARIVISION analytics
The team PARIVISION secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Dust II. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PARIVISION were Jame contributed 30 kills and Qikert contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14526 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PARIVISION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 23 kills and Cjoffo contributed 21 kills. 11334 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent PARIVISION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments