0 Comments
55
69
16
-14
330
9:10
13
0
-16%
65
55
22
+10
360
10:9
14
1
+5%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.3346
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.1785
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4548
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.54.2
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.1785
Percentage of headshots
39%16%
USP kills on a map
31.5954
USP damage (avg/round)
13.14.9
Player score (round)
39921011
Player score (round)
36531011
Info
Map Analysis of PARIVISION vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Dust II Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Dust II were maden, who contributed 19 kills, and aVN, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 6833 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PARIVISION on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for PARIVISION, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PARIVISION on Dust II included xiELO, who contributed 16 kills, and Jame, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6273 total damage, PARIVISION couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments