159
124
46
+35
392
21:22
45
2
Overpass6.1
+9%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- —
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
44%
Ancient
30%
Mirage
11%
Anubis
9%
Nuke
7%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
8
13
Inferno
0%
0
25
Ancient
29%
17
4
Mirage
54%
13
2
Anubis
50%
14
5
Nuke
50%
8
10
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
56
Inferno
44%
16
15
Ancient
59%
32
8
Mirage
43%
21
19
Anubis
59%
32
14
Nuke
57%
23
13
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwww
- lllwl
Info
Match analysis of PARIVISION vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PARIVISION and SINNERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Mirage, and victory was secured by PARIVISION. The MVP of this match was BELCHONOKK.
PARIVISION analytics
The team PARIVISION secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PARIVISION were BELCHONOKK contributed 41 kills and ArtFr0st contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16780 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PARIVISION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SINNERS were NEOFRAG contributed 34 kills and oskar contributed 26 kills. 13678 of total damage by SINNERS could not prevent PARIVISION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments