PARIVISION Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

16

3

+8

107

2:2

6

0

7.6

+25%

16

16

4

0

75

2:1

4

0

5.9

-1%

13

18

5

-5

67

1:4

3

0

5.3

-8%

8

18

3

-10

55

4:5

1

0

4.7

-24%

8

15

3

-7

39

0:2

2

0

4.3

-36%

Total

69

83

18

-14

343

9:14

16

0

5.5

-9%

Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

14

0

+12

95

7:2

9

0

8.3

+43%

14

13

2

+1

70

5:1

3

0

6.2

-5%

17

14

7

+3

83

0:2

5

0

6.1

+16%

13

11

8

+2

63

0:0

4

0

5.7

-1%

13

17

6

-4

74

2:4

3

0

5.4

-1%

Total

83

69

23

+14

384

14:9

24

0

6.3

+10%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of PARIVISION vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were sausol, who contributed 26 kills, and kyuubii, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8841 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PARIVISION on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for PARIVISION, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PARIVISION on Anubis included BELCHONOKK, who contributed 24 kills, and X5G7V, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7888 total damage, PARIVISION couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date