Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

10

9

+8

132

3:3

5

0

8.4

+41%

15

8

3

+7

79

1:1

4

1

6.9

+28%

15

11

1

+4

74

3:2

5

0

6.5

+13%

11

8

5

+3

69

0:0

2

0

6.0

0%

10

9

3

+1

65

3:2

2

0

5.7

-1%

Total

69

46

21

+23

419

10:8

18

1

6.7

+16%

PARIVISION Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

11

3

+2

77

1:1

4

1

6.5

+2%

12

16

6

-4

88

4:3

2

0

6.2

-2%

12

15

2

-3

68

2:4

3

0

5.3

-14%

5

14

2

-9

39

0:0

1

0

4.1

-37%

3

14

2

-11

26

1:2

0

0

3.5

-60%

Total

45

70

15

-25

298

8:10

10

1

5.1

-22%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs PARIVISION by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were xfl0ud, who contributed 18 kills, and LNZ, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7535 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PARIVISION on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for PARIVISION, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PARIVISION on Anubis included BELCHONOKK, who contributed 13 kills, and Qikert, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5364 total damage, PARIVISION couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date