1 Comments
75
42
21
+33
424
14:4
20
1
Anubis7
+20%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
68%
Dust II
25%
Mirage
17%
Vertigo
15%
Nuke
13%
Ancient
5%
Anubis
4%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
44
Dust II
80%
5
6
Mirage
59%
41
0
Vertigo
33%
18
19
Nuke
42%
19
15
Ancient
52%
25
6
Anubis
50%
24
11
Last 5 maps
Inferno
68%
25
9
Dust II
55%
11
27
Mirage
42%
26
15
Vertigo
48%
21
22
Nuke
55%
51
1
Ancient
57%
47
6
Anubis
46%
46
18
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of PARIVISION vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PARIVISION and Enterprise, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by PARIVISION. The MVP of this match was ArtFr0st.
PARIVISION analytics
The team PARIVISION secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PARIVISION were ArtFr0st contributed 19 kills and Qikert contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8047 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PARIVISION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Enterprise analytics
The team Enterprise managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Enterprise were Demho contributed 13 kills and Sobol contributed 9 kills. 4820 of total damage by Enterprise could not prevent PARIVISION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
1 Comments