0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov kills on a map
21.0849
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.55.6
Galil kills on a map
41.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.55.6
Decoy grenades thrown
31.291
Trades on a map
9.023.5084
Assists on a map
114.3517
Player score (round)
34691012
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Dust II
75%
Mirage
71%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
18%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
8%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
20
Dust II
75%
8
6
Mirage
71%
7
5
Nuke
75%
16
5
Overpass
43%
7
2
Inferno
60%
5
5
Vertigo
33%
6
4
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
5
Mirage
0%
4
3
Nuke
50%
6
0
Overpass
25%
4
4
Inferno
50%
2
2
Vertigo
25%
4
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Paradox vs Overt by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Paradox and Overt, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Mirage, and victory was secured by Paradox. The MVP of this match was nettik.
Paradox analytics
The team Paradox secured 31 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Paradox were nettik contributed 48 kills and chelleos contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18082 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Overt analytics
The team Overt managed to secure 10 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Overt were damyo contributed 24 kills and ObZen contributed 22 kills. 12439 of total damage by Overt could not prevent Paradox from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Overt struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments