0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
146.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
67.825.3
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.95.4
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.33.8
Shots (total/round)
13016
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
43521012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
75%
Mirage
67%
Ancient
67%
Dust II
56%
Nuke
33%
Inferno
31%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
75%
8
0
Mirage
67%
12
5
Ancient
67%
3
10
Dust II
56%
9
4
Nuke
33%
3
15
Inferno
69%
13
7
Vertigo
0%
2
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
2
Mirage
0%
2
1
Ancient
0%
1
1
Dust II
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of Paradox vs Lese by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Paradox and Lese, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by Paradox. The MVP of this match was zeph.
Paradox analytics
The team Paradox secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Paradox were zeph contributed 44 kills and ekul contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19329 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lese analytics
The team Lese managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lese were Deqny contributed 24 kills and supar contributed 23 kills. 13649 of total damage by Lese could not prevent Paradox from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lese struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments