Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
144.6
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.35.4
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.8
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
34641012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
75%
Nuke
67%
Ancient
67%
Dust II
56%
Mirage
24%
Inferno
3%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
75%
8
2
Nuke
33%
3
17
Ancient
67%
3
11
Dust II
56%
9
4
Mirage
64%
14
5
Inferno
64%
14
7
Vertigo
0%
2
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
1
4
Ancient
0%
0
4
Dust II
0%
3
2
Mirage
40%
5
0
Inferno
67%
3
3
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Info
Match analysis of Paradox vs Kanga by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Paradox and Kanga, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Paradox. The MVP of this match was zeph.
Paradox analytics
The team Paradox secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Paradox were zeph contributed 29 kills and bedonka contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12230 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Kanga analytics
The team Kanga managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Kanga were Edlinn contributed 22 kills and DANZ contributed 21 kills. 10875 of total damage by Kanga could not prevent Paradox from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Kanga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments