Paradox Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

16

7

+13

116

7:4

9

0

8.1

+27%

25

16

6

+9

92

4:3

7

0

7.2

+13%

23

14

3

+9

94

0:1

6

0

7.0

+29%

21

13

3

+8

75

3:1

3

0

6.6

+7%

9

13

11

-4

59

0:3

2

1

5.1

-16%

Total

107

72

30

+35

436

14:12

27

1

6.8

+12%

ex-Lese Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

20

2

+3

92

2:2

7

2

7.3

+18%

13

23

5

-10

68

3:1

3

0

5.2

0%

14

19

1

-5

49

2:6

4

0

4.9

-9%

10

22

4

-12

61

2:2

0

0

4.8

-18%

11

24

4

-13

57

3:3

1

0

4.7

-23%

Total

71

108

16

-37

327

12:14

15

2

5.4

-6%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Paradox vs ex-Lese by the Bo3.gg Team

Paradox on Inferno Analysis

Paradox demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Paradox on Inferno were DannyG, who contributed 29 kills, and nettik, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11327 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ex-Lese on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ex-Lese, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ex-Lese on Inferno included supar, who contributed 23 kills, and kyson, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8500 total damage, ex-Lese couldn't prevent Paradox from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-Lese struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date