0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
153
USP kills on a map
31.616
USP damage (avg/round)
14.24.6
Smoke thrown on a map
1815.0371
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.53.4
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
52.516.7
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.22
M4A4 kills on a map
113.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
49.712.7
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
79%
Overpass
71%
Vertigo
71%
Nuke
68%
Ancient
67%
Dust II
53%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
1
1
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Inferno
79%
19
16
Overpass
71%
28
9
Vertigo
71%
14
32
Nuke
68%
34
5
Ancient
67%
18
10
Dust II
53%
30
19
Mirage
0%
0
60
Info
Match analysis of PAMPAS vs Bravos by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PAMPAS and Bravos, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Bravos. The MVP of this match was WOOD7.
Bravos analytics
The team Bravos secured 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Bravos were WOOD7 contributed 20 kills and Leomonster contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8529 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PAMPAS analytics
The team PAMPAS managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PAMPAS were BerSeCkaZo contributed 11 kills and bichop contributed 11 kills. 5065 of total damage by PAMPAS could not prevent Bravos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PAMPAS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments