0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Dust II
40%
Vertigo
36%
Nuke
20%
Overpass
12%
Ancient
7%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
70%
10
3
Dust II
0%
1
12
Vertigo
83%
6
2
Nuke
60%
20
0
Overpass
50%
4
8
Ancient
62%
21
0
Inferno
73%
15
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
20%
5
0
Dust II
40%
5
0
Vertigo
47%
15
0
Nuke
40%
25
0
Overpass
38%
8
0
Ancient
55%
22
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- llwlw
Info
Map Analysis of PALOMA vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
PALOMA on Nuke Analysis
PALOMA demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 27 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PALOMA on Nuke were OLIMP, who contributed 29 kills, and sNx, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10342 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, PALOMA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ThunderFlash on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for ThunderFlash, as they managed to secure 0 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ThunderFlash on Nuke included Mride, who contributed 22 kills, and pawkoem, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9377 total damage, ThunderFlash couldn't prevent PALOMA from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments