Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
176.7327
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4399
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
14.83.8
Shots (total/round)
9216
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
40801012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
57%
Overpass
33%
Mirage
17%
Nuke
15%
Inferno
12%
Anubis
5%
Vertigo
2%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
25%
8
29
Overpass
33%
3
47
Mirage
71%
21
7
Nuke
69%
26
0
Inferno
40%
15
29
Anubis
62%
21
2
Vertigo
64%
14
5
Last 5 maps
Ancient
82%
28
0
Overpass
0%
0
52
Mirage
54%
13
18
Nuke
54%
24
11
Inferno
52%
25
21
Anubis
67%
24
3
Vertigo
62%
13
9
Info
Match analysis of paiN vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between paiN and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by paiN. The MVP of this match was biguzera.
paiN analytics
The team paiN secured 45 out of 83 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 13 bombs during the match.
The standout players for paiN were biguzera contributed 61 kills and skullz contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31060 overall damage.
On the defensive side, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 38 out of 83 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were togs contributed 56 kills and rdnzao contributed 50 kills. 28278 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent paiN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments