Ended
1
paiN
0 - 2
AMKAL
Full stats

4 Comments

paiN Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

14

2

-1

68

5:4

4

0

5.9

-8%

13

15

4

-2

71

2:1

3

0

5.7

-5%

7

12

3

-5

44

0:2

1

1

4.8

-29%

7

15

3

-8

48

1:1

1

0

4.5

-32%

7

14

4

-7

53

1:4

2

0

4.4

-31%

Total

47

70

16

-23

285

9:12

11

1

5.1

-21%

AMKAL Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

17

6

4

+11

78

5:0

5

0

7.3

+24%

18

10

3

+8

84

2:1

4

0

6.9

+18%

15

9

9

+6

96

1:1

4

0

6.7

+25%

13

12

3

+1

67

4:4

3

0

6.1

-1%

5

10

6

-5

36

0:3

0

0

4.0

-29%

Total

68

47

25

+21

361

12:9

16

0

6.2

+7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of paiN vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team

AMKAL on Inferno Analysis

AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AMKAL on Inferno were icy, who contributed 17 kills, and Forester, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7581 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


paiN on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for paiN on Inferno included biguzera, who contributed 13 kills, and kauez, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5985 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments4
By date