0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
103.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
37.512.7
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:41s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6930
Eco wins full buy
1
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Damage (total/round)
38873
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
50%
Dust II
0%
Overpass
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Inferno
50%
2
1
Nuke
50%
4
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Overpass
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Overperformers vs R!OT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Overperformers and R!OT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by R!OT. The MVP of this match was Oily.
R!OT analytics
The team R!OT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for R!OT were ObZen contributed 66 kills and Anima contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25553 overall damage.
On the defensive side, R!OT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Overperformers analytics
The team Overperformers managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Overperformers were Oily contributed 62 kills and Mr Shark contributed 55 kills. 27030 of total damage by Overperformers could not prevent R!OT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Overperformers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments