0 Comments
101
148
20
-47
267
13:26
21
3
Inferno5.5
-10%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Nuke
80%
Vertigo
63%
Overpass
56%
Mirage
56%
Inferno
55%
Dust II
29%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
2
Vertigo
25%
4
1
Overpass
0%
0
1
Mirage
56%
9
0
Inferno
25%
12
0
Dust II
100%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
7
2
Nuke
80%
10
5
Vertigo
88%
8
4
Overpass
56%
9
1
Mirage
0%
0
17
Inferno
80%
10
7
Dust II
71%
7
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of OSbard vs Lynn Vision by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OSbard and Lynn Vision, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by Lynn Vision. The MVP of this match was z4kr.
Lynn Vision analytics
The team Lynn Vision secured 25 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lynn Vision were z4kr contributed 46 kills and Starry contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19477 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lynn Vision held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OSbard analytics
The team OSbard managed to secure 19 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OSbard were Mozst contributed 28 kills and SecreT- contributed 27 kills. 11798 of total damage by OSbard could not prevent Lynn Vision from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OSbard struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments