0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
52%
Train
50%
Mirage
42%
Nuke
36%
Ancient
20%
Inferno
16%
Dust II
14%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
17%
6
3
Train
0%
0
4
Mirage
71%
7
1
Nuke
0%
0
6
Ancient
20%
5
2
Inferno
75%
4
0
Dust II
44%
9
2
Last 5 maps
Anubis
69%
13
6
Train
50%
2
13
Mirage
29%
7
15
Nuke
36%
14
2
Ancient
0%
0
20
Inferno
59%
17
3
Dust II
58%
19
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- wwwll
Info
Map Analysis of Only One Word vs Housebets by the Bo3.gg Team
Housebets on Dust II Analysis
Housebets demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Housebets on Dust II were pz, who contributed 18 kills, and yourwombat, who added 10 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8420 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Housebets held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Only One Word on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Only One Word, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Only One Word on Dust II included Oath, who contributed 16 kills, and Freeman, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6829 total damage, Only One Word couldn't prevent Housebets from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Only One Word struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments