Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
11.83.4
Player score (round)
35231012
Shots (total/round)
8916
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9226.8
HE damage (total/round)
9526.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Nuke
69%
Overpass
63%
Inferno
62%
Vertigo
60%
Mirage
9%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
7
7
Nuke
31%
13
4
Overpass
63%
19
0
Inferno
38%
8
10
Vertigo
60%
5
9
Mirage
59%
17
3
Ancient
0%
1
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
1
2
Overpass
0%
1
2
Inferno
100%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Mirage
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of OneTap vs Israel by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OneTap and Israel, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Israel. The MVP of this match was BluePho3nix.
Israel analytics
The team Israel secured 35 out of 61 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Israel were BluePho3nix contributed 56 kills and shushan contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24552 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Israel held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OneTap analytics
The team OneTap managed to secure 26 out of 61 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OneTap were swiiffter contributed 42 kills and GEOHYPE contributed 37 kills. 19647 of total damage by OneTap could not prevent Israel from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OneTap struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments