Stake-Other Starting
OG Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

14

4

+5

87

3:2

5

0

7.2

+17%

16

11

3

+5

76

4:1

4

0

7.0

+10%

15

12

8

+3

87

1:0

4

0

6.7

+14%

14

11

7

+3

78

4:3

2

0

6.5

+3%

11

10

5

+1

82

1:0

3

0

6.3

+3%

Total

75

58

27

+17

411

13:6

18

0

6.7

+10%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

16

1

-1

74

2:2

4

0

6.0

-1%

12

15

5

-3

86

0:1

3

0

5.7

+8%

11

13

4

-2

55

0:3

3

1

5.2

-13%

8

15

4

-7

51

1:3

3

1

5.0

-30%

8

17

5

-9

62

3:4

2

0

4.5

-31%

Total

54

76

19

-22

329

6:13

15

2

5.3

-13%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Anubis Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Anubis were Chr1zN, who contributed 19 kills, and spooke, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7800 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included simke, who contributed 15 kills, and aVN, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6243 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date 
Stake-Other Starting