Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
11816
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
10126.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Shots (total/round)
10216
Player score (round)
36201012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Vertigo
63%
Overpass
33%
Nuke
30%
Inferno
27%
Mirage
11%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
5
1
Vertigo
0%
0
28
Overpass
33%
6
10
Nuke
29%
7
18
Inferno
77%
13
3
Mirage
61%
18
0
Ancient
60%
10
10
Last 5 maps
Dust II
20%
5
20
Vertigo
63%
8
9
Overpass
0%
2
22
Nuke
59%
17
3
Inferno
50%
12
8
Mirage
50%
10
10
Ancient
63%
8
6
Info
Match analysis of OG vs MOUZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OG and MOUZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by MOUZ. The MVP of this match was torzsi.
MOUZ analytics
The team MOUZ secured 32 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ were torzsi contributed 40 kills and NBK- contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18706 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OG analytics
The team OG managed to secure 21 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OG were mantuu contributed 36 kills and nexa contributed 31 kills. 15944 of total damage by OG could not prevent MOUZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments