0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.83.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.42
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.73.4
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:54s
Player score (round)
38421012
Player score (round)
35191012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
69%
Mirage
42%
Overpass
33%
Nuke
23%
Ancient
20%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
10
Mirage
33%
3
9
Overpass
17%
6
8
Nuke
56%
18
3
Ancient
40%
5
4
Inferno
43%
28
0
Vertigo
30%
10
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
11%
9
7
Mirage
75%
8
8
Overpass
50%
12
1
Nuke
33%
9
7
Ancient
60%
20
0
Inferno
33%
24
5
Vertigo
25%
8
8
Info
Match analysis of OFFSET vs VELOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OFFSET and VELOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by OFFSET. The MVP of this match was Lr0z1n.
OFFSET analytics
The team OFFSET secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for OFFSET were Lr0z1n contributed 23 kills and Shr contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11345 overall damage.
On the defensive side, OFFSET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
VELOX analytics
The team VELOX managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for VELOX were tutehen contributed 15 kills and TiburoN contributed 16 kills. 9023 of total damage by VELOX could not prevent OFFSET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, VELOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments