0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.616.7
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.15.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
53521012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
4
HE damage (total/round)
11926.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
USP kills on a map
41.616
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Mirage
36%
Vertigo
26%
Inferno
17%
Dust II
12%
Nuke
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
4
5
Mirage
0%
3
16
Vertigo
43%
7
9
Inferno
46%
13
3
Dust II
57%
7
3
Nuke
43%
7
5
Overpass
0%
3
12
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
2
2
Mirage
36%
11
0
Vertigo
17%
6
7
Inferno
29%
7
5
Dust II
45%
11
1
Nuke
40%
10
3
Overpass
0%
3
11
Info
Match analysis of OFFSET vs NASR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OFFSET and NASR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by OFFSET. The MVP of this match was shellzi.
OFFSET analytics
The team OFFSET secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for OFFSET were shellzi contributed 48 kills and NOPEEJ contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19767 overall damage.
On the defensive side, OFFSET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NASR analytics
The team NASR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NASR were REAL1ZE contributed 32 kills and Remind contributed 34 kills. 16960 of total damage by NASR could not prevent OFFSET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NASR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments