0 Comments
46
81
20
-35
286
6:9
9
4
Ancient5.2
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
46%
Mirage
43%
Anubis
22%
Ancient
16%
Inferno
15%
Nuke
9%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
46%
13
5
Mirage
0%
0
79
Anubis
72%
36
3
Ancient
59%
41
16
Inferno
42%
24
27
Nuke
51%
37
10
Vertigo
30%
23
35
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
12
Mirage
43%
7
2
Anubis
50%
6
2
Ancient
43%
14
0
Inferno
57%
7
3
Nuke
60%
10
4
Vertigo
33%
3
3
Last results
Past matches
- wlwlw
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of ODDIK vs Patins da Ferrari by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ODDIK and Patins da Ferrari, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by ODDIK. The MVP of this match was misfit.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ODDIK were naitte contributed 29 kills and ksloks contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7921 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Patins da Ferrari analytics
The team Patins da Ferrari managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Patins da Ferrari were misfit contributed 13 kills and zede contributed 10 kills. 5544 of total damage by Patins da Ferrari could not prevent ODDIK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Patins da Ferrari struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments