Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
18.94.6
Player score (round)
40681012
Player score (round)
35831012
Player score (round)
35641012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
HE damage (total/round)
14826.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:21s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
30%
Inferno
21%
Nuke
18%
Ancient
13%
Mirage
3%
Dust II
1%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
25%
8
4
Inferno
71%
7
5
Nuke
73%
11
1
Ancient
70%
10
0
Mirage
40%
5
16
Dust II
69%
13
11
Vertigo
0%
0
19
Last 5 maps
Overpass
55%
11
5
Inferno
50%
16
6
Nuke
55%
20
8
Ancient
57%
7
20
Mirage
43%
14
15
Dust II
68%
19
6
Vertigo
0%
0
44
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ODDIK vs Isurus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ODDIK and Isurus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by ODDIK. The MVP of this match was deco.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ODDIK were remix contributed 26 kills and vLa contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11879 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Isurus were deco contributed 26 kills and reversive contributed 24 kills. 10611 of total damage by Isurus could not prevent ODDIK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Isurus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments