0 Comments
74
71
30
+3
354
13:11
20
0
Anubis6.2
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
176.5888
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
44573
Player score (round)
35841011
Player score (round)
38251011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
M
100%
Ancient
N
25%
Anubis
N
17%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Anubis
67%
6
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Anubis
50%
6
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wllww
Info
Match analysis of NuTorious vs Maximum Ego by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NuTorious and Maximum Ego, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by NuTorious. The MVP of this match was jr24racing.
NuTorious analytics
The team NuTorious secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NuTorious were jr24racing contributed 21 kills and LOOKEEE contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8496 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NuTorious held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Maximum Ego analytics
The team Maximum Ego managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Maximum Ego were Johan contributed 19 kills and -_AJ contributed 16 kills. 8303 of total damage by Maximum Ego could not prevent NuTorious from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Maximum Ego struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments