0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4629
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.62
Molotov damage (avg/round)
12.22
HE damage (avg/round)
11.83.4
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
72.716.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.54
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
204.7
Trades on a map
63.4638
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
80%
Nuke
75%
Inferno
50%
Ancient
39%
Anubis
29%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
17%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
80%
5
17
Nuke
75%
4
36
Inferno
50%
12
12
Ancient
64%
14
14
Anubis
46%
13
22
Overpass
83%
6
9
Mirage
50%
10
19
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Nuke
0%
0
6
Inferno
100%
1
3
Ancient
25%
4
0
Anubis
17%
6
0
Overpass
100%
1
5
Mirage
67%
3
0
Info
Match analysis of NRG vs G3 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NRG and G3, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by G3. The MVP of this match was kralz.
G3 analytics
The team G3 secured 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for G3 were kralz contributed 17 kills and N20AmZ contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7087 overall damage.
On the defensive side, G3 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NRG analytics
The team NRG managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NRG were autimatic contributed 9 kills and oSee contributed 9 kills. 4510 of total damage by NRG could not prevent G3 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NRG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments