0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
AWP kills on a map
116.2912
AWP damage (avg/round)
64.121.6
USP kills on a map
31.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
14.34.9
M4A1 kills on a map
74.306
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
55.416.3
USP damage (avg/round)
14.44.9
Kills on a map
25.0616.6028
Deaths on a map
1.9616.7502







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Train
100%
Dust II
73%
Mirage
36%
Inferno
33%
Ancient
15%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
13%
Last 5 maps
Train
100%
1
4
Dust II
73%
15
13
Mirage
56%
27
9
Inferno
67%
3
32
Ancient
65%
26
6
Nuke
64%
14
5
Anubis
63%
8
26
Last 5 maps
Train
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
2
4
Mirage
20%
5
4
Inferno
100%
1
5
Ancient
50%
4
2
Nuke
50%
2
7
Anubis
50%
4
1
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Nouns vs vagrants by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nouns and vagrants, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Nouns. The MVP of this match was Junior.
Nouns analytics
The team Nouns secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nouns were Junior contributed 25 kills and Peeping contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6803 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nouns held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
vagrants analytics
The team vagrants managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for vagrants were mason contributed 6 kills and Sandman contributed 9 kills. 3470 of total damage by vagrants could not prevent Nouns from securing the victory
On the defensive side, vagrants struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments