0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Dust II
60%
Ancient
41%
Inferno
24%
Mirage
21%
Anubis
5%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
33%
6
0
Inferno
20%
5
0
Mirage
33%
3
0
Anubis
25%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Dust II
60%
10
3
Ancient
74%
19
0
Inferno
44%
9
1
Mirage
54%
13
0
Anubis
20%
5
1
Nuke
0%
0
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- llwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Noobs But Diligent vs Bromo by the Bo3.gg Team
Bromo on Ancient Analysis
Bromo demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bromo on Ancient were FIOURN, who contributed 19 kills, and Miami, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7457 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Bromo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Noobs But Diligent on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Noobs But Diligent, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Noobs But Diligent on Ancient included chuzhongT, who contributed 16 kills, and expSasiKi, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6881 total damage, Noobs But Diligent couldn't prevent Bromo from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Noobs But Diligent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments