0 Comments
101
72
28
+29
461
16:7
27
3
Dust II7.3
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- —
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Mirage
100%
Ancient
100%
Overpass
80%
Dust II
35%
Inferno
16%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
3
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Overpass
80%
5
0
Dust II
60%
10
0
Inferno
17%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
4
0
Dust II
25%
4
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- llllw
Info
Match analysis of NoNamers vs virtualetix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NoNamers and virtualetix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by NoNamers. The MVP of this match was ToreQ.
NoNamers analytics
The team NoNamers secured 0 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NoNamers were ToreQ contributed 25 kills and Firelegends contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10605 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NoNamers held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
virtualetix analytics
The team virtualetix managed to secure 23 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for virtualetix were stuerzi1 contributed 25 kills and Mafii contributed 14 kills. 8147 of total damage by virtualetix could not prevent NoNamers from securing the victory
On the defensive side, virtualetix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments